Looking Back

I don’t have much to say this week, so I thought I’d share a list of roots I came up with for my old conlang, Cosmopolitan:

  1. left
  2. right
  3. thumb
  4. pointer
  5. middle
  6. ring
  7. pinky
  8. beginning
  9. middle
  10. end
  11. self
  12. counterpart
  13. other
  14. with
  15. against
  16. or
  17. to
  18. through
  19. color
  20. long
  21. tall
  22. wide
  23. distance
  24. time
  25. solid
  26. liquid
  27. gas
  28. plasma?
  29. energy
  30. good
  31. not
  32. what
  33. person
  34. place
  35. for
  36. thing?
  37. is
  38. in/out
  39. surface
  40. open/close
  41. addition
  42. multiplication
  43. exponentiation
  44. integration
  45. way
  46. use
  47. enclosure
  48. opening
  49. essence
  50. stasis
  51. flux
  52. number
  53. pelvis
  54. circle
  55. shape
  56. line
  57. give
  58. life
  59. animal
  60. plant
  61. seed
  62. ability
  63. machine
  64. open
  65. possible
  66. homogeneous
  67. god
  68. category
  69. whole
  70. part
  71. order
  72. harmony

This is from the fourth draft, which I deliberately left incomplete, because previous drafts went way over 100 roots. There were also some repeats in my notes, which I omitted here. Question marks were present in my original list. There’s a lot of weird stuff here, most of which I won’t retain for the game, but which still might be interesting to explain.

What I call “left” and “right” are actually two very special roots which are used to distinguish between members of what I call “arbitrary pairs”. Left and right are put forward as sort of the archetypal arbitrary pair, but I would also include anything else which has a counterpart which is not an opposite per se. For example, male and female, or positive and negative in the context of electric charge. For “in/out” and “open/close”, I believe I was thinking that those roots would be combined with the arbitrary pair roots to discern which was which, but Esperanto calls open “un-close”, and the simplest solution is often the best.

Next I have each of the fingers as roots, and these are also extremely important. Imagine a child counting on their fingers. These are where the numbers in Cosmopolitan would come from. Each of the roots for the fingers is combined with “left” and “right” to yield a name for each of the ten fingers, and thus each of the first ten numbers. I also considered using the set of fingers for other things which seemed to come in fives, such as the traditional set of senses: sight, hearing, taste, touch, and smell. I also considered working the phases of matter into this system (with energy on the thumb), as well as the dimensions (length, width, height, space in general, and time), but I decided against it in this draft for some reason.

“Beginning”, “middle”, and “end” would be very versatile in my model. The arm-beginning is the shoulder, the arm-middle is the elbow, and the arm-end is the wrist. Likewise, the leg-beginning is the hip, the leg-middle is the knee, and the leg-end is the ankle.

“Self”, “counterpart”, and “other” refer to the personal pronouns, first, second, and third respectively. Chinese uses them sometimes in abstract ways such as the names I’ve given these roots might suggest. From the first-person pronoun, 我, we get 自我, which works like the English prefix “self-“, which in turn gives us 自我介绍, self-introduction. 他 means “he”, 人 means “person”, and 他人 are other people.

I won’t comment on this much more because I wrote it many months ago and already forgot a lot of what I was thinking, but one thing that sticks out is “pelvis”. “Pelvis” is sort of a euphemism for a root which could refer either to excretory or sexual functions. Yeah…

Body parts are a glaring omission here, because they generally could have interesting figurative uses. All of the sensory organs can be used to refer to their senses. Bones and skeletons can refer figuratively to underlying structures. The head can (and already does) refer to a leader.

My ideas about pronouns, arbitrary pairs, and beginning/middle/end will probably carry over to the game. They already exist in the current alpha version. But a lot of other stuff probably won’t. And it shouldn’t. It keeps the language within the boundaries of what a player is willing to learn. But moreover, it would expand the scope of the conversation the player can have far beyond what I can account for. My goal for the release version is that every question the player can ask will have an answer. Not an interesting answer necessarily, but some kind of answer. That means that every time I add vocabulary to the game, I need to add more information about the game’s universe as well. If a player can ask anything, I need to program in everything. There’s no reason to take it that far. I only want just enough that I have a satisfying game.

Advertisements

Published by:

grantkuning

Creator of Sethian. My personal email is grantkuning at gmail. Kickstarter: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1158657297/sethian-a-sci-fi-language-puzzle-game Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/sethiangame Twitter: https://twitter.com/sethiangame

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s